Connect with us

News

First Bird Flu Case in Louisiana Raises Health Concerns

Transmission of avian flu to human still poses a rare occurrence yet complicating its chances to jump from animals to humans and prompting a strengthened surveillance.

First Bird Flu Case in Louisiana Raises Health Concerns
First Bird Flu Case in Louisiana Raises Health Concerns


United States: It looks like this is the first case of avian flu in Louisiana.

In a health alert issued Friday, state officials said the case involves “a resident of southwestern Louisiana. The individual had exposure to sick and dead birds that are suspected to have been infected with H5N1,” the virus that causes bird flu. The patient has since been hospitalized, as reported by HealthDay.

Avian Flu Cases Across the U.S.

At least 60 people have been reported with human bird flu this year in the United States. Most of the reported cases have been from California and Washington, and most of the infections have occurred where humans were exposed to infected poultry or dairy cows.

At the moment, there is no information on the transmission of bird flu from person to person, and most reported cases have been quite mild; the worst sign of it has been conjunctivitis or pinkeye. No deaths have been reported.

Only the week before, U.S. health officials said that the type of bird flu that was found in a young California boy is the same type that has infected flocks of birds and livestock. This raises questions about how the patient became infected, given that no direct contact with sick poultry was reported.

Although those results were not conclusive, tests showed that ‘the virus resembled viruses identified in both dairy cattle and birds as well as A[H5N1] viruses that have been transmitted previously to dairy farmers in California’.

“This case does not change CDC’s assessment of the immediate risk to the general public, which remains low at this time,” the agency added.

California Case Raises Questions

However, California health authorities said last week that they are still working to determine how the child may have been infected with bird flu. The child was treated with flu antivirals and has made a recovery.

Richard Webby, a virologist at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital who focuses on flu, doesn’t believe the community spread contributed to the new case in California. However, other animals that may have been exposed to the virus, like cats, dogs, or rats, tend to contribute to its spread.

Indeed, a study conducted last week indicated that cats could be silent weavers of bird flu.

Concerns Over Animal-Human Transmission

Scientists have been concerned for months now that the virus roaming through humans and animals will develop a propensity for passing easily from human to human.

In the California case, there is no evidence that the virus was passed from one person to the other, and all the family members of the child tested negative.

Avian flu cases in humans — which have been contracted by nearly all the victims, farm workers — have now been reported in seven states.

Global Implications

California has the highest incidence of human avian flu cases, with 34 recorded positive infections in the country. According to the CDC data, 11 cases have been recorded in Washington and 10 cases in Colorado.

In early May, authorities in Canada reported that a teenager in British Columbia was in critical condition with what is believed to be bird flu.

Avian Flu Impact on Livestock

The source of the infection is not known either because the patient is not reported to have any way of coming across infected poultry, mentioned authorities. They pointed out that this was the initial human illness caused by this virus in the given province and throughout Canada.

Throughout the country, continued infections involving over 845 dairy herds in 16 states have occurred since last summer when the outbreak in dairy cows was identified. Epidemiological studies of avian influenza have confirmed its existence in wild and domestic birds across the US for some time now, as reported by HealthDay.

“We should be very concerned at this point,” Dr. James Lawler, co-director of the University of Nebraska’s Global Center for Health Security told New York Times. “No one should be pressing the panic button just yet, but everyone should be throwing a lot of money at trying to find out why it is happening.”

News

Nicotine Cap Could Expose Cigarettes’ True Danger 

Nicotine Cap Could Expose Cigarettes' True Danger 

United States: The Biden administration is expected to officially put forward a limit to nicotine in cigarettes in the last days of its term. It would be an eleventh hour act to speak against the tobacco industry after Biden has still not solidify plans to enact a prior campaign promise of eradicating menthol cigarettes, as reported by NBC News.  

A Last-Minute Push Against Tobacco Addiction 

The plan, which may be unveiled as soon as this Monday, is not likely to include methods such as tobacco alternatives or vaping and nicotine gum, patches, and lozenges. 

“This is a Hail Mary from the Biden administration to move forward with a meaningful proposal, or at least to jump-start one in the waning days of the administration,” said Erika Sward, assistant vice president of national advocacy for the American Lung Association. 

The Hook Behind Smoking Addiction 

The chemical compounds that lead to chronic diseases and death for smokers are those found in combustible tobacco, whereas nicotine is the addictive substance that initially engages the smoker and sustains the habit. 

The specific measures regarding the proposed limits of nicotine have not been unveiled. Various researchers have it, however, that it may have to be reduced to as low as 5% for the product to be considered minimally or non-addictive. 

Nicotine Cap Could Expose Cigarettes' True Danger. Credit | Getty Images
Nicotine Cap Could Expose Cigarettes’ True Danger. Credit | Getty Images

“This would be a historic action by the FDA that has the potential to have an enormous impact on public health,” said Dr. Rose Marie Robertson, science and medical officer of the American Heart Association. 

America’s Leading Preventable Health Threat 

A vast majority of smokers have taken their first cigarette in their teenhood. The move to a lesser addictive cigarette, Sward said, would save millions of lives. 

An academic analysis conducted by the Food and Drug Administration in 2018 showed that the cap on nicotine levels would lead to 16 million people not becoming smokers, to begin with, by 2060. According to that study, it would rise to 33.1 million by the year 2100 at the earliest level. 

That means even if the Biden administration releases the proposed rule next week, it will probably be years before it becomes final. 

Game-Changing Public Health Impact 

Yolanda C. Richardson, president and CEO of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, told NBC News that limiting the amount of nicotine in cigarettes would be “game-changing.” Few initiatives would make a greater impact on combating chronic illnesses like cancer and heart disease, which significantly impair American health and that the next government has stated should be a top focus. 

Nicotine Cap Could Expose Cigarettes' True Danger. Credit | Getty Images
Nicotine Cap Could Expose Cigarettes’ True Danger. Credit | Getty Images

Before the FDA announced it was thinking about capping nicotine levels, which it has the right to do, it was during President-elect Donald Trump’s first term in office. 

Challenges Ahead for the Proposed Rule 

By announcing a “comprehensive plan” in 2017, then-FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb started the process by proposing to “regulate nicotine in combustible cigarettes and render them minimally or non-addictive.” 

It was also designed, in part, to refocus adult smokers onto non-combustible products like e-cigarettes. The 2017 plan also envisaged regulation of e-cigarette flavors and a total ban on the use of menthol products. In 2020, the federal government approved a restriction on all popular flavors, although menthol is still available. 

Adding to this, in an interview this week, Gottlieb stated that smoking prevalence would have to be “on the list of top priorities of any public health agenda geared towards reducing chronic diseases.” 

“There could be perhaps no more impactful thing we can do than to dramatically reduce smoking rates in this country,” he said. 

Continue Reading

News

Is a Foreign Weapon Behind Havana Syndrome?  

Is a Foreign Weapon Behind Havana Syndrome?  

United States: The CIA and the Treasury Department do not believe a foreign power has caused the still-unexplained ailments that affected some U.S. diplomats and other officials while posted in Cuba, but two agencies now concede it is possible that an adversary might have developed or even used a weapon to produce the mysterious injuries, as reported by HealthDay. 

The conclusion, which resembles the findings of the earlier probes, stems from a survey of seven intelligence bodies that analyzed the incidences of head impacts and other symptoms expressed by other American diplomats and various other military and governmental personnel who raised the concerns about involvement of a foreign competitor. 

Intelligence Findings 

The new assessment of the situation was unveiled by the U.S. intelligence on Friday. When assessing the data, five intelligence agencies stated that the external enemy’s participation is highly improbable, a U.S. intelligence official told reporters upon the briefing on condition of anonymity since it was the requirement of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 

Two of the agencies, however, concluded that it could be that a foreign power might have developed, or perhaps used, a weapon that might have caused the injuries reported by the US diplomats and the government officials. 

Is a Foreign Weapon Behind Havana Syndrome?  
Is a Foreign Weapon Behind Havana Syndrome?  

The Ongoing Mystery 

Headaches, balance problems, and problems with thinking and sleeping were first reported in Cuba in 2016 and in hundreds of American personnel in several countries later in the year. American diplomats stationed in Havana were the first to complain, which prompted the sequence of maladies to be nicknamed Havana syndrome. 

The two agencies, which officials did not name, failed to trace any of these events to a particular foreign technology but came to their conclusions through some understanding of foreign weapons systems development and capabilities. Finally, one of the agencies discovered that the probability was roughly even that a foreign government utilized such a weapon or prototype device in a small, unknown number of cases involving U.S. personnel. 

The other agency concluded that although it might have been developed by another nation, it is still doubtful that it has ever been used. 

The Biden Administration’s Response 

The Biden administration has been under pressure to probe the incidents after the American staff complained of brain injuries and other symptoms after keeping getting attacked in what some call an attempt to attack and harm US personnel operating in a foreign land. However, till now, officials have not been able to pinpoint any one reason for such events. 

Friday revelations issued are a variant of a ‘change in key judgments by some intelligence components’ and require further research, National Security Council spokesperson Sean Savett said in an email communiqué to journalists. 

“Our focus on these priorities remains unwavering and must continue,” Savett said. “It is vital that the U.S. government continue critical research, investigate credible incidents, and strengthen efforts to provide timely care and long-term clinical follow-up.” 

No Direct Evidence  

The intelligence official who briefed reporters on Friday dismissed the shift, stating that the two agencies that left open the possibility that a foreign government was developing or deploying a weapon that caused the injuries had reported low confidence in their assessment, as reported by HealthDay. 

The official admitted that other NSAs were more sure that foreign governments were not involved and that certain intelligence leads discovered by some of the U.S. intelligence raised doubts about foreign involvement. 

“There’s no intelligence linking a foreign actor to any specific event,” the official told reporters. 

Continue Reading

News

Could Nicotine Caps End Smoking Addiction? 

Could Nicotine Caps End Smoking Addiction? Credit | AP

United States: More specifically, in the last days of its term, the current Biden government is speculated to formally offer a threshold on nicotine levels in cigarettes. It would probably be taken at the eleventh hour to counter the tobacco industry after President Joe Biden did not seal a long-standing promise to ban cigarettes containing menthol, as reported by NBC News.  

A Last-Minute Push for Nicotine Regulation 

The change will likely happen until next Monday and will not affect items such as tobacco products such as e-cigarettes or nicotine replacement patches and lozenges. 

“This is a Hail Mary from the Biden administration to move forward with a meaningful proposal, or at least to jump-start one in the waning days of the administration,” said Erika Sward, assistant vice president of national advocacy for the American Lung Association

Though people die and get sick from the poisonous chemicals produced by combustible tobacco, it is the nicotine that initially hooks smokers and sustains their addiction. 

Details of the proposal for reducing the levels of nicotine have not been disclosed comprehensively. It was not the end of the year, though, when numerous studies have pointed out that, to achieve the compounds minimally or non-addictively, dosage may have to be reduced by almost 95 percent. 

Could Nicotine Caps End Smoking Addiction? 
Could Nicotine Caps End Smoking Addiction? 

The Impact of Nicotine Reduction 

“This would be a historic action by the FDA that has the potential to have an enormous impact on public health,” said Dr. Rose Marie Robertson, science and medical officer of the American Heart Association. 

Tobacco use itself is the number one cause of preventable disease and death in the United States, based on the CDC, resulting in more than 480,000 deaths per year. 

Data indicated that the majority of smokers began the habit when they were teenagers. Sward said that any process that could make cigarettes less appealing, less enjoyable, or less satisfying would save millions of lives. 

An FDA study carried out in 2018 found that a nicotine cap would reduce smoking addiction cases to 16 million people in the year 2060. It would rise to 33.1 million in 2100, based on the study’s estimate. 

Even if the Biden administration issues the proposed rule early next week, it may take several years to become final. 

Yolonda C. Richardson, president and CEO of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, told NBC News that limiting the amount of nicotine in cigarettes would be “game-changing.” Few initiatives would make a greater impact on combating chronic illnesses like cancer and heart disease, which significantly impair American health and that the next government has stated should be a top focus. 

The first time the FDA weighed in on limits on nicotine was during President-elect Donald Trump’s first term in office. 

A Decade in the Making 

In 2017,then-FDA Commissioner Dr.Scott Gottlieb kick-started the process with a “comprehensive plan,” of which one proposal was to “regulate nicotine in combustible cigarettes and make it minimally or nonaddictive.” 

It was meant, in part, to move adult smokers to less hazardous products like vapor cigarettes or e-cigarettes. The 2017 plan also contained the prospect of integrating the regulation of e-cigarette flavors and a complete prohibition on the use of menthol products. A federal rule to eliminate most flavored e-cigarettes in 2020, but they now come in menthol flavor, as reported by NBC News.  

This week, in an interview with Gottlieb, he was of the opinion that smoking incidence would necessarily have to be on the list of activities, which needed focus to enhance the health standards of people with chronic diseases

“There could be perhaps no more impactful thing we can do than to dramatically reduce smoking rates in this country,” he said. 

Continue Reading

Sign Up for Our Newsletter


Join our subscribers list to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly in your inbox.


Trending